Money, Chome, and ChatGPT: The high stakes of Google’s monopoly trial

Near the opening of his opening arguments, David Dahlquist, a lawyer for the US Department of Justice, showed a descent that helium described arsenic Google’s “vicious cycle.” It goes similar this: Google pays billions of dollars to beryllium the default hunt motor practically everywhere, frankincense it gets much hunt queries, frankincense it gets amended data, frankincense it is capable to amended its results, frankincense it makes much money, frankincense it tin spend much defaults. Google doesn’t truly disagree with this appraisal — but successful it’s telling, that’s a virtuous cycle. Another mode to picture it is arsenic the virtuous rhythm that makes Google Search truthful powerful: Google believes it’s created a cleanable system; the DOJ thinks it’s a nightmare. A justice volition marque the last call.

Dahlquist’s remarks were the opening salvo of the remedies signifier of US v. Google, a landmark antitrust lawsuit that ended with justice Amit Mehta uncovering past twelvemonth that Google’s hunt motor is simply a monopoly. The question successful the courtroom this time, to beryllium litigated implicit the adjacent 2 weeks, is what to bash to hole it. And according to Dahlquist, the process has to commencement by stopping each portion of the rhythm from spinning.

The DOJ is asking for 3 wide …

Read the afloat communicative astatine The Verge.