Is there a ‘right’ way to use AI in art?

The arguments against AI successful creation are obvious. Most ocular artists hatred Midjourney, Stability AI, and akin representation generators, decrying the scraping of grooming information without compensation and the onslaught of generic “slop.” But is it imaginable to deliberately misuse generative AI for originative work? 

Oakland, California-based creator Brett Amory uses representation generators arsenic tools constantly. Instead of passively churning retired generic images successful ample volumes — what helium himself has referred to arsenic addictive and mind-numbing “fast art” — Amory focuses connected worldbuilding and glitching the machine. He draws inspiration from his time occupation astatine a San Francisco Kinko’s successful the precocious ’90s, agelong earlier helium broke done arsenic an award-winning painter, erstwhile helium would spot garbage and plants into the photocopiers to marque collages. Now, he’s prompting an LLM to roleplay successful an invented language, inciting a ocular feedback loop betwixt generative images and quality intervention.  

“We’re successful a precise weird infinitesimal for artists close present erstwhile it’s conscionable not wide what benignant of motivation extremity posts determination are astir AI art,” says Brooklyn-based creation criti …

Read the afloat communicative astatine The Verge.