The erstwhile employees said galore Apple files they had been shared connected implicit their careers astatine the company—including readying documents for merchandise motorboat events—continued to sync to their idiosyncratic devices done the iCloud retention work aft they near Apple. In immoderate cases, they adjacent received notifications astir caller updates to the documents. Some erstwhile employees said they were petrified to delete the files for fearfulness that doing truthful would pull Apple's attention.
Apple files get mixed successful with employees' accounts due to the fact that the institution encourages them to usage their idiosyncratic Apple Accounts with their enactment ‌iCloud‌ account. Employees are fixed a 2TB ‌iCloud‌ program and are capable to merge the retention with their existing Apple Account oregon make a caller account. Since lone 1 superior relationship tin beryllium signed successful astatine a time, astir opt to usage their existing relationship to debar having to transportation 2 iPhones.
Apple has a managed folder for workplace files that it revokes entree to erstwhile an worker leaves, but immoderate interior documents aren't saved determination automatically and shared files extremity up mixed successful with idiosyncratic content. Employees tin besides clasp entree to iMessage chats and files shared via the Messages app.
Lingering entree to Apple systems is cardinal to Apple's suit against OpenAI. In its filing, Apple alleged that erstwhile worker Chang Liu breached Apple's systems utilizing a "rare, antecedently chartless authentication bug" to download files portion helium was moving astatine OpenAI.
Apple told The Information that the OpenAI suit is unrelated to immoderate files near disposable connected ‌iCloud‌ and that it does not prosecute ineligible claims against erstwhile employees who accidentally person Apple documents successful their idiosyncratic ‌iCloud‌ accounts.
This lawsuit is astir OpenAI employees wrongfully taking Apple's concealed and confidential accusation regarding our unreleased technologies, processes, and products. Nothing successful the filing relates to documents shared by, oregon stored in, iCloud.
Former employees accidental Apple does not bash a thorough capable occupation going done idiosyncratic devices to region delicate files that person been stored successful ‌iCloud‌. In a now-settled ineligible dispute, spot institution Rivos claimed Apple intentionally lets erstwhile employees clasp entree to files "as portion of a planned effort to make a pretextual ground to writer the employees and their caller leader for 'stealing' Apple material." In the Rivos case, an worker was targeted for keeping enactment files successful his idiosyncratic ‌iCloud‌ account.
Another erstwhile Apple worker sued by Apple, Gerard Williams, countersued and accused the institution of utilizing intimidation tactics to scare radical reasoning of leaving. Apple sued Williams for breach of declaration aft helium started processor institution Nuvia, presenting extended telephone and substance records of his communications. The tribunal rejected Williams' claim, and Apple dropped the lawsuit successful 2023.
In 2025, Apple also accused erstwhile Vision Pro technologist Di Liu of downloading thousands of firm documents to his idiosyncratic unreality retention soon earlier leaving the institution for Snap.
The Information does not outright suggest Apple is purposefully allowing erstwhile employees to clasp entree to ‌iCloud‌ files, but points retired that Apple's usage of ‌iCloud‌ for record sharing and its incomplete wiping of worker accounts are astatine likelihood with its dense absorption connected privateness and security.
Tag: Apple Lawsuits
This article, "Apple's iCloud File Sharing Left Ex-Employees With Access to Secret Documents" archetypal appeared connected MacRumors.com
Discuss this article successful our forums
 (2).png)
2 hours ago
1











English (US) ·