Apple Fires Back at OpenAI's Bid to Toss Trade Secrets Suit

Apple has urged a national justice to cull OpenAI's caller question to disregard its commercialized secrets lawsuit, arguing successful a caller filing that the company's defence depends connected "distortion, speculation, and improper extrinsic evidence."


Apple sued OpenAI successful July, accusing the institution of moving a strategy to propulsion confidential merchandise accusation retired of erstwhile Apple employees who became occupation candidates and caller hires. Apple's suit claims much than 400 erstwhile Apple employees present enactment astatine OpenAI.

Earlier this month, OpenAI's question argued that Apple successful its filing ne'er decently identified what accusation really counts arsenic a protectable commercialized secret. The institution said it has nary involvement successful Apple's confidential worldly due to the fact that it is "building thing wholly caller and antithetic from thing astatine Apple."

But successful a 32-page absorption little filed Wednesday, seen by MacRumors, Apple restates respective of its main allegations against erstwhile technologist Chang Liu and OpenAI hardware main Tan Yew Tan, and argues that OpenAI's defenses are information disputes that should beryllium resolved aft discovery, alternatively than utilized for dismissal.

Apple says Liu exploited a "rare authentication bug" to entree Apple's web retention weeks aft joining OpenAI, and downloaded dozens of confidential engineering files, including a presumption connected however to manufacture and trial main logic boards.

As for Tan, Apple repeats its allegation that helium utilized interior task codenames to question interrogation candidates astir unreleased Apple products. The institution besides claims that Tan asked 1 Apple worker to bring components she had worked connected to OpenAI for a "show and tell" session. The components are said to person included batteries, system-on-chips (SoCs), logic boards, and shields.

Apple besides counters OpenAI's statement for dismissal that Apple has not identified a protectable commercialized concealed that the institution allegedly stole. Citing the Ninth Circuit's 2025 Quintara decision, Apple contends that this accusation does not request to beryllium disclosed yet due to the fact that it is simply a "fact dispute" that should beryllium resolved aboriginal erstwhile grounds has been presented, either astatine summary judgement oregon trial.

Apple besides points retired that forcing it to picture its commercialized secrets successful circumstantial item successful a nationalist filing would magnitude to publishing the precise secrets it's trying to protect.

The remainder of the little argues OpenAI is relying connected worldly the justice isn't allowed to see astatine this stage. OpenAI included text messages, a website listing Apple's codenames, and a transcript of its interrogation usher to enactment its motion. Apple argues that nary of it belongs determination due to the fact that a disregard is based connected the ailment alone.

Apple besides uses 1 of OpenAI's ain lines against it. OpenAI's question called its guiltless mentation for Tan's behaviour "at slightest arsenic plausible" arsenic Apple's. Indeed, Apple argues that nether Ninth Circuit precedent, the lawsuit moves guardant alternatively than being thrown retired wherever 2 plausible explanations compete.

Judge Edward J. Davila is acceptable to perceive the company's arguments connected October 1.
This article, "Apple Fires Back astatine OpenAI's Bid to Toss Trade Secrets Suit" archetypal appeared connected MacRumors.com

Discuss this article successful our forums